代写global economies, civil societies, and the environment

代写global economies, civil societies, and the environment
Please complete the question embedded in the topic below.
Many academic commentators argue that neoliberalism is out of control and is distorting, weakening and threatening our global society in many ways.
Are corporations too powerful and presenting as a threat to global economies, civil societies, and the environment? Please provide examples to support your arguments. A report observing academic conventions of 3000 (not include Executive Summary) words is required on a specific topic based on issues of relevance on material covered in the whole of the course. For this task, students must use at least Four sources from the learning hub and a further Eight quality academic references in the form of textbooks or journal articles or quality websites.
E.S: what, and the key finding
Introduction: overviewed the question, what and why.
Finding and discussion should be at least 4 parts.
1.      Power of corporation
Need to conclude: Government more powerful or Business Corporation more powerful (depend on the counties)
2.      Impact on the civil  society  
3.      Impact on the Economics  
4.      Impact on the Environment
Conclusion
Font and spacing: Times New Romans or Arial 12 font. Space and a half is preferred.
Please follow the Report Structure outlined below.

The Assessment Criteria for Assessment Task 3 is as follows.

·         Key issues have been developed
·         Analysis and synthesis of the relevant literature used.
·         Ideas and assertions substantiated through use of high-quality reference material and key academic perspectives/views have been used
·         Explicit linking of the research literature to answering the chosen question.
·         The avoidance of opinions or arguments that are not substantiated by academic references.
·         Clear and comprehensive written style (spelling, grammar, syntax etc.)
·         Appropriate Harvard style referencing (in-text and list of references ) refer http://www1.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=8rwjnkcmfoeez
 
 
 

Task 3 Report Structure

A reminder: on the title page, please type your name, student number, tutor’s name and the topic title. A contents page is optional.
 
Executive Summary.
The executive summary needs to provide an overview of the whole report. The executive summary outlines the purpose, research method (which is a literature review based on quality academic journal articles, texts and a few websites of a high such as ILO, OECD, World Economic Forum). All students should discuss suitable websites with their tutor. The executive summary outlines your findings based on your research, and main conclusions - i.e. what you have concluded from your research. It is best to write your final executive summary when you have completed the rest of the report. (200 words)
Introduction
In your introduction outline what you are going to do and the position you are adopting - please use your introduction as a map to cover the points you outline sequentially in the body of your report to stay on track. An introduction needs to outline the purpose, context, background rationale and then advise that the key terms will be defined and you also need to set limits on the research by identifying what you are going to cover and sticking to it (your road map). Each sentence in your introduction needs to be followed in your report generally with corresponding paragraphs in the body of your report and signal that the research is through the use of quality academic sources only and identify issues specifically related to what you have been asked to cover and by referring to and citing relevant academic literature.
The Body of Your Report
Your definitions, arguments must all be supported by your references - every comment you make that presents as a fact, assertion or argument has to be substantiated with a good reference that is cited or quoted in the text. Marks are lost for unsubstantiated opinions. In fact, your opinion is not sought here. What we are interested in is your capacity to synthesise and communicate well-researched information.
 
 
Conclusion
This where you write what you have concluded based only on your research – this is where you can base your opinion on your research and express an opinion. The conclusion is not a summary.
References (refer- http://www1.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=8rwjnkcmfoeez) Use Harvard referencing, please.
Font and spacing: Times New Romans or Arial 12 font. Space and a half is preferred.
 

Synthesising

When you are writing in this course, you will be developing points of view and arguments through all the paragraphs you write. Everything you have to say must be supported by evidence from a range of sources. Your real skill as a writer will be to integrate your ideas and your backup evidence so that they flow seamlessly and convincingly through your essay. Synthesising is a specialised skill whereby you summarise similar ideas from more than one source of information.
Key words: balance, integrating, synthesising
Balancing evidence in your writing
Balancing evidence means that you will weave together (integrate) information from different sources into each paragraph in the body of your report. There are three strategies you can use to present evidence in your essay: paraphrasing, summarising (which includes synthesising) and direct quoting. As your assignment has been set to challenge you to investigate, interpret and use research on a topic, your reports will need to be a balance of evidence from quality sources. Such sources need to suited to academia (text books, journal articles, renowned websites such as OECD, ILO, etc. or resources on the learning hub). For those that do not access these resources and adopt the strange practice of trawling the web and locate inferiror sources you will receive low marks as have other students before you.
Here is the RMIT Learning Lab document on synthesising – refer https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/
 

Critical analysis

Critical analysis involves:
1.      Carefully considering an idea and weighing up the evidence supporting it to see if it is convincing.
2.      Then being able to explain why you find the evidence convincing or unconvincing.
It helps if you ask yourself a series of questions about the material you are reading. Try using these questions to help you think critically:
·         Who is the author and what is their viewpoint or bias?
·         Who is the audience and how does that influence the way information is presented?
·         What is the main message of the text?
·         What evidence has been used to support this main message?
·         Is the evidence convincing; are there any counter-arguments?
·         Do I agree with the text and why do I agree or disagree?
 

Some ways to boost critical analysis in your reports Avoid unnecessary description – only include general background details and history when they add to your argument, e.g. to show a crucial cause and effect. Practice distinguishing between description (telling what happened) and analysis (judging why something happened).   Interpret your evidence – explain how and why the evidence you are citing supports your argument. Interpretation is an important part of critical analysis, and you should not just rely on the evidence "speaking for itself". Be specific - avoid making sweeping generalisations or points that are difficult to support with specific evidence. Do not write your opinion in the body of your report. Your opinion should only appear in the conclusion based on your academic research.  It is better to be more measured and tie your argument to precise examples or case studies. Use counter-arguments to your advantage – if you find viewpoints that go against your arguments from other academic commentary do not ignore this as it strengthens an argument to include an opposing viewpoint and explain why it is not as convincing as the reasoning you favour based ion your academic judgment.

 代写global economies, civil societies, and the environment