ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 环境行为学 代写

ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 环境行为学 代写

ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 2017: Assignment 2 instructions 1 Assignment 2: Exploring reasons for environmental concern and behaviour Due Date: 9 am Monday 15th May 2017 Word limit: 1500 words excluding reference list, interviewee quotes and transcripts of interviews Submission: Electronic copy submitted online through LMS (in the assessment section) Assessment weighting: 35% of final grade Objective The objective of this assignment is to deepen your understanding of social responses to environmental issues (e.g. environmental policies or management practices) or to environmentally relevant behaviours. Using a single interview/case, you will explore how theory helps (or doesn’t help) to understand the way a person responds to environmental policy or engages in an environmentally significant behaviour. In this project you are to choose either an environmental issue or an environmentally significant behavior as the focus of the study. An example of an environmental issue would be responses to power generation from wind farms or coal fired power plants, the use of genetically modified crops, recycled water, or harvesting of timber in native forests. Examples of environmentally significant behaviors include transport choices, recycling, growing vegetables at home, composting, and installation of solar panels. You do not have to choose one of these examples but can select an issue or behavior that is of interest to you. If you choose to explore response to an environmental issue or policy, your aim is to identify factors that appear to influence acceptance, opposition and concern in relation to that issue or policy. If you choose to explore an environmentally significant behavior, your project should examine factors that encourage or discourage the participant to engage in the particular behavior. Learning outcomes Through this process you will develop: -  a deeper understanding of theories of environmental concern and behaviour and how these apply to issues of interest to you -  a better understanding of how people understand environmental issues -  further basic research skills for understanding human-environment interactions, including: o enhanced capacity to understand diverse views about environments o introductory level skills in qualitative data collection and analysis o skills for reporting social scientific information and applying this to questions about human-environment interactions ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 2017: Assignment 2 instructions 2 1  Preparing for data collection 1.1 Set objectives Before you commence collecting data, you need to establish objectives or key ‘research questions’ for your study. Two templates for research questions are provided below. Choose ONE of these and adapt it to the issue or behaviour you are interested in. 1. What factors influence the views of one person on [specify the environmental policy or practice or change you will explore] OR 2. What factors encourage or discourage one person to [specify the environmentally significant action of interest to you] 1.2 Read background information Before you start, ensure you understand the theory that informs the question you will investigate. Search for studies that have investigated similar questions to the one you will address. •  If you have chosen Question 1, ensure you understand theories that explain acceptability of environmental management and policy (especially but not only Stankey and Shindler 2006 and Devine-Wright 2005). Then you should seek research articles that have empirically examined acceptance/attitudes to the issue you will focus on (or related issues). For example, if you are interested in acceptance of recycled water, Dolnicar and Hurlimann (2011) examine factors affecting public acceptance of recycled water and desalinated water. •  If you have chosen Question 2, ensure you understand theories that explain environmentally significant behaviour (see for example Steg, van den Berg and de Groot (2013), also Stern 2000, Gardner and Stern 2002, Koger and Winter 2010). Search for research articles that empirically examine factors that influence the behaviour you will focus on (or related behaviours). For example, if you are interested in composting of waste, Sussman and Gifford (2013) examine factors influencing composting in a food mall. 1.3 Preparing for the interview You need to interview one person about their views on the issue or behaviour of interest to you. This interview can be conducted in person, via telephone or online. Interviews must be documented in detail (transcribed). 1. Get familiar with the issue or behaviour that will provide a focus for this assignment (for example, have a look at websites to understand what concerns about been raised about the issue in the media, or look at government websites to identify if there are laws or incentive programs relevant to target behaviour). 2. Decide on interview questions: Your interview questions should allow you to understand the links between the key theories and the issue you are exploring, so make sure your interview questions examine different aspects of the theory that are relevant. Some possible questions are provided below but these are suggestions only, you can select the questions to ask depending on the issue and the theory you have selected. Select questions that are ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 2017: Assignment 2 instructions 3 relevant to you objective and adapt these to match your specific issue or behaviour. You should develop a set of questions that are likely to make good links between theory and the issue. Once you have decided on the questions to ask, it is a good idea to practice asking them with someone from the class. Some people give very short answers to these kinds of questions. If this is the case you can use verbal ‘prompts’ (e.g. tell me more, why/why not) to encourage the interviewee to expand on their answers. Some possible interview questions: On response to policy issue: •  Are you aware of [the issue/policy/practice/change]? •  What are your general views on this issue? What aspects of the [issue/policy/practice/change] are positive? What aspects do you not like? •  How did you first hear about this issue? •  What was your response at that time? •  Have your views changed since then? •  What has influenced your views on this issue? •  Where have you gone to find information about this issue? •  What do you see as the risks, costs and benefits of [the change/practice/policy]? •  Do you like the look of [specify some visual aspect associated with the issue if this is relevant – e.g. wind farms, logging in native forests etc.]? Or Does [the issue] have any impact on the visual beauty of [specify environment that might be impacted by the issue]? •  What do your friends/colleagues/others think about this issue? How have their views influenced you? •  Do you trust [the agencies responsible for managing the issue/policy/practice/change]? Why or why not? •  Have you ever acted to protest or support this [issue/policy/practice/change], e.g. written to Member of Parliament or signed a petition? What did you say? •  What do you think should happen in the future? What would you like to see done differently? Possible questions about behaviour: •  Can you tell me about how you [behaviour item e.g. ‘use water in your home]? •  Over the past few years have you done anything to reduce/increase [target behaviour e.g. outdoor water use at home]? •  Why do you (or don’t you) undertake [specify target behaviour e.g. your water use outdoors at home]? •  What do you see are the costs and benefits of [specify target behaviour e.g. your water use outdoors at home]? What financial, legal or political factors influence your decisions on this issue? What financial, legal or political factors prevent you from taking this responding to the situation in the in the way you would like to? •  Who else is involved in making these decisions? What are their views on the issue? •  Has anyone tried to influence you to act in a particular way on this issue? Who was that? What did they want you to do? How did you respond and why? ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 2017: Assignment 2 instructions 4 •  Are you aware of [laws or incentives related to target behaviour e.g. current water restrictions in Melbourne]? •  How do [laws or incentives related to target behaviour e.g. current water restrictions in Melbourne] influence your behaviour? •  How have you gotten information about this issue? Whichever question you use, you might also consider using a ‘laddering interview technique’ to try and clarify values. We practiced this approach during tutorials, so look at notes from this for ideas. 2.  Collecting the data 2.1 Select and recruit your participant. Make sure the person you invite to participate has some knowledge or familiarity of the issue or behaviour you are investigating. You will also get more out of this assignment if this person is different to yourself (consider age, cultural background, but particularly their concern or action in regard to the environment). The person may be a friend, relative or acquaintance but MUST be over 18 years of age. He or she should not be in a dependent relationship with you (e.g. they must not be someone you employ or supervise). 2.2 Explain the project Before asking the person to take part in an interview you must provide information so the person can decide whether or not they consent to participating. Explain that the project is part of coursework for this subject and explain the purpose of the project (to investigate how people respond to environmental issues or behaviours)and what involvement is required (e.g. participate in an interview of approximately 10 minutes regarding views on [specify the issue or behaviour]). Emphasise that participation is voluntary, that the interview will be recorded in detail, and that you will be reporting the interview in an assignment and not using it in any other way. If he/she is not willing to participate, thank them for their time and ask someone else. 2.3 Conduct the interview In many cases this can be done at the same time as recruitment since the interview is quite short. 2.4 Transcribe the interview. This should be word for word. Note that emails are not a suitable way to conduct the interview – although other instant messaging options should work fine. 3.  Analyse the data Keep in mind your overall research question – your analysis needs to be targeted to answer this question, and to make links between the theory and the issue as seen through the eyes of your participant. ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 2017: Assignment 2 instructions 5 Some ideas for focus: Consider the values (important outcomes or ideals) expressed in the participant’s answers. For example, how would you characterise their main value orientations, are they most concerned about themselves (egoistic), other people (social-altruistic) or the environment (biospheric)? Consider the reasons the participant gives (or reasons evident in their response) for supporting or not supporting the policy, or for acting/not acting in a particular way. What factors seem to influence this response? Do the factors noted in theory appear to play a role? Do some factors appear to be more important than others? Do some of the reasons given seem to have little relationship to the theory? 4.  Prepare your report

ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 环境行为学 代写 Structure your report in the following way: (Note: word counts are suggested only) Introduction (450-550 words): This section should state the aim of the investigation (the key research question, adapted for your purposes), draw on theory to explain the reason for posing this question and what you expect to find, and outline what other researchers have found regarding your key research question (as much as possible, focus on research that applies the question to your environments of interest – where there is none, provide examples from related research). Make sure you appropriately reference the reading material you draw on. Method (200-250 words): Describe the way you collected the data for this assignment. Briefly describe the type of person (simply approximate age and education/work background and any other relevant information) you interviewed. Explain briefly how and why you selected this person. How did you collect the data (e.g. face-to-face interview, instant messaging or similar)? What questions were asked? Try to make this description brief but comprehensive. In writing scientific reports we aim for transparency and repeatability, so provide sufficient details so that the reader could potentially repeat the procedure. Results/Discussion (500-600 words): Present your analysis in a way that helps answer the research question, noting the suggested approach to analysis above. It’s really important that you provide evidence to support your observations in this section. With qualitative research, evidence is provided in the form of words spoken by the participants (quotes). Don’t paste in the whole interview but select short sections of answers that demonstrate the point you are trying to make. Include enough of the context to make it clear what was being referred to. Where the observations support or challenge the set readings, comment on this. Include the full text of your interview in an appendix (not included in word limits). Conclusion (250 - 250 words): In this section, answer the research question as best as you are able. Give a short summary of the factors influencing attitudes or behaviour as evident in your study. Comment on any limitations of the study. References: Make sure you list the readings you have referred to in your report, using an appropriate citation method. Citations should follow the APA style (not counted within the 1500 words limit on the assignment). ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 2017: Assignment 2 instructions 6 Appendices: Include the interview transcript (not counted in the 1500 word limit on the assignment). 5.  A note about research ethics in reporting: For reasons of privacy, you should present your methods, results and interview transcript in ways that protect the identity of the person you interview. For example, don’t use their name in your report – you can use pseudonyms (made up names) if it makes it easier to organise information in your assignment. Similarly, you may need to disguise other information that could be used to identify the interviewee – for example, it may be best to disguise information about organisations with which your participant is are involved. 6.  References cited above Dolnicar, S., Hurlimann, A., & Grün, B. (2011). What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? Water Research, 45(2), 933-943. Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.

ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 环境行为学 代写 Koger, S. M., & Winter, D. D. N. (2010). The psychology of environmental problems : psychology for sustainability (3rd ed.). New York: Psychology Press. Stankey, G. H., & Shindler, B. (2006). Formation of social acceptability judgments and their implications for management of rare and little-known species. Conservation Biology, 20(1), 28-37. Steg, L., van den Berg, A. E., & de Groot, J. I. M. (2013). Environmental psychology an introduction BPS textbooks in psychology (pp. xxix, 376 p.). Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/lib/unimelb/Doc?id=10558123 Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. Sussman, R., & Gifford, R. (2013). Be the Change You Want to See: Modelling Food Composting in Public Places. Environment and Behavior, 45(3), 323-343. ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 2017: Assignment 2 instructions 7 Assessment Criteria Read through these criteria before preparing your report since you will be assessed against these: Criteria Introduction 10 marks The aim/research question is clearly stated The context for the study (why it is worth understanding this) is clearly stated Theory relevant to the research is clearly explained to the reader Past empirical research on the research question (or related topics) is identified and considered Ideas are correctly attributed to their authors Methods 4 marks It is clear what kind of person took part in this study, and how and why they were chosen. It is clear how data was collected – what questions were asked, how long it took, how responses were recorded Results/ Discussion 10 marks The analysis of interviews is clearly related to the aim/research question The analysis of interviews makes good use of quotes to defend observations The interpretation of data makes good links between data and relevant theory or findings of previous research Conclusion 5 The conclusion clearly summarises the findings, answering the key research question The limits of this study are explained Presentation 6 The language is clear and simple, and any jargon is defined. The referencing is correct, consistent and provides all necessary information about sources. The overall structure of the report follows guidelines (including subheadings: introduction, methods, results/discussion, conclusion) Transcriptions of the interview is included in an appendix TOTAL  ENST 20001 Human Behaviour and Environment 环境行为学 代写